Betmaster-Feedback
I can only say: the tool is ingenious. With a little familiarisation, it works for everyone.

Getting started is, of course, a bit tricky due to the massive number of setting options, but it is without question worth it. It is rather a miracle that it was possible to realise all the setting options within a programme at all. But once you have got to grips with it, it is easy to use, you grow into it and can get to grips with the system more and more. Apart from that, the Wettopa and support have always helped me with problems, questions are answered, there are tutorials on Youtube, the help is constantly being revised... In any case, I no longer want to bet without the tool, because why should I bet with less available data than I have?

I have found many such offers on the net and tried them out. They try hard. What the Betmaster tool can do puts everything in the shade.

The many possibilities are welcome for me. If the same values came out for everyone and you couldn't change anything about it, then it wouldn't do me any good. I can implement my sports mind the way I like it. Often it's only small changes. But they decide whether a bet is indicated or not. In any case, I never make a bet without the betmaster any more. If I don't like a suggestion, I don't have to do it anyway, and if I think the computer is wrong here, I can tell it to work it out better. It's just up to me.
Robert O.Sports bettor
Everything fits together. The tool calculates EVERYTHING for me. But I prefer betting on goals. Sure, that's what makes betting and watching football fun. I don't want to cheer because both teams only play cross passes and no chances are created, do I? In the past, however, I always just bet according to my instincts, perhaps also because I hoped for goals. The tool picks out the games in which there really are a few goals. Especially with the number of goals, you can't do that as a human being with pure intuition. With the tool, it's very easy - and quite logical. The results have convinced me so far.
Sandra B.Sports bettor
I think it's fantastic that Tool distinguishes so well how much a team is a favourite. Nobody has to explain to me that Glasgow Rangers in Scotland or Ajax in Holland are the best teams. But whether they are 1.15 or 1.10 or 1.20 against St.Mirren or Willem II? Only the tool can do that so accurately. I've never seen that before.
Micha E.Mathematician and sports betting professional
I have been betting for about 3 years, just for fun, as entertainment. I decided to test the betmaster on the Brazilian 1st league because it started relatively early. As a basic setting, I only weighted the last season, otherwise I didn't change anything because I don't have the experience to make adjustments. Every adjustment would also be a bet on the future, I preferred the system to adjust itself according to the respective results.
My approach always has 3 steps: First, keep an eye out for news. For example, if there are a lot of injured players, I don't bet. Then look in betmaster to see if it is indexed or not. And finally, make a bet out of it. I bet 1x2, always with the same stake and took the best odds from 3 providers. Current status: Almost always one side was indexed, I have 113 bets, with 6 units in the plus. When the odds were high, I usually played double chance. If I had only ever played 1 or 2, I would currently be 11 units in the black. The difference is probably due to the fact that the deviation is greater at higher odds, and if you bet the draw as well, the indexing is lower in percentage terms compared to just a win. Overall, I would say, subject to the still low sample, that a plus-minus-zero is possible. I see the strengths in betmaster in its rational nature. Home advantage, current form, etc. are not always easy to intuit.
In the next step, I am thinking about how the Brazilian peculiarities can be accommodated in betmaster: Many draws. Few goals. No spectators. Watching, I get the impression that the many English weeks lead to a dullness among the players. They don't go all-in. The basic assumption is always 0-0 with a very reduced offensive. If a goal is scored, that's it! And yet all the players in this league are so well technically trained. Somehow a contradiction. The games seem monotonous. Another peculiarity of this league is the many alleged fouls. This simply makes it more difficult to score goals. Players are constantly being taken away with stretchers or golf carts, apparently simply the consensus that football has to be played this way. I ask myself whether this makes it easier for underdogs to win and the influence on the distribution of results. Have fun!
moonblade
Coaching with Dirk Paulsen -
I got the test version and, quite honestly, I consider myself an advanced user who knows his way around quite well, but I just couldn't get to grips with the tool. Where, how and when to press which button? No, that was not for me. And I wanted to file it away. But then I heard from others and saw that they seemed to be able to cope. So I allowed myself an hour with the Wettopa. Just as honest as my scepticism at the beginning: he explains everything in such a way that you understand it and can use the tool immediately. Of course, we also chatted a bit about betting and the betting market, about focus and so on. But I'm now at the point where I can handle the tool. And there's no question about it: I'm thrilled. We only initialised one league as an example. All the odds that came out looked great. I don't know how all this is supposed to work, but it blows your mind. I wouldn't have thought that possible. What I think is possible is this: I allow myself another hour. Even if I already felt pretty experienced: you inevitably learn something new. Apart from that, if you want to hear it: it's really fun! What's the saying? Time is money. Here I have invested both well.
Previous
Next